Contacts:Tom Edwards
Public information Office
(301) 763-3030 (phone)
(301) 763-3762 (fax)
(301) 457-1037 (TDD)
Pio@census.gov
People who have worked at home increased by nearly 2 million, approximately 9.5 million in 1999 to about 11.3 million in 2005, THE U.S. Census Bureau, published by the amount of new information.Almost half of these workers had college degrees in home and almost half of them earned $ 75,000 years or more.
These figures are from the home-based workers in the United States: 1999-2005, the number of tables that employment, occupations and the United States at home workers in the description of the characteristics of the entire workforce. Tables and compare them, for those who are not at home is made of a supplement. information on the Survey of income and program participation.
"Data analysis show an increasing proportion of expenditure at least some time working from home," said the head of the Census Bureau Journey to work and Migration statistics Branch Alison fields. "This study provides a better picture of the attributes of these people and what occupations and professions in order to allow them to work from home. "
At home employees throughout the US, 8% of the ways suppress appetite
workforce in 2005 growth of 7% in 1999; of those, who have worked at home in 2005, around 8.1 million did so solely, growth 6,7 million in 1999.
Shall examine them, who have worked at home in 2005 the largest percentage worked in industry and related services (32%), business, repair and maintenance services (12%) and finance, insurance and real estate (10%).
Among the most popular professions, which is to be indicated in the work at home were professional (25%), Vice President, administrative and managerial skills (22%) and sales (18%).
The median monthly level of income for workers who have worked at home were about $ 2,400 in 2005; the median ANNUAL INCOME by such workers in the family was approximately $ 68,000.
High paying jobs were the most likely cause for some or all of the working time of homeworkers. in 2005, 46% of people who they worked in the home of some or all of the time said € 75,000 per year, home workers, which will be carried out at least every lot of 34% compared to the. those who have worked for both the home and the Office of the high paying jobs in the most — approximately 54% of which $ 75,000 or more a year in 2005.
With the money to exceed hours. around 11% who worked at the home of some or all of their workweek reported number of hours 11 or more typical a day in 2005, only about 7% of workers who worked outside the home, announced this.
Long hours, although there seemed more flexibility for people who have worked at home. in 2005, approximately 23% of home workers informed the weekly working time of between, only 10% of those who have worked outside the home.
The home workers ' properties:
Approximately 51% was in 2005 was female. About 4% below the 15-24; almost 18% 25-34 was 26% 35-44, 45-54 was 26%; 18% in the 55-64 age group and almost 65 was 9% and older. White non-Hispanics made up of around 82% of this workforce; black accounted for about 6%, Asian almost 4% and all other races around 3% of Hispanics., which may be of any race, consisting of, who have worked at home around 6 percent. [1] [2] About 47% had at least Bachelor's degree; almost 32% had at least some college; approximately 17% of upper secondary school diploma, and about 5% less than high school diploma. The Survey of income and program participation in national-level estimates and subgroups of the population living in the United States produces and allows monitoring of trends over time, in particular the selected features, such as revenue, expenditure eligibility and participation in the programmes shall be adopted in accordance with the transfer, the composition of the household and family, work force and other events related to the problem.All the studies in accordance with these data are methods of sampling and nonsampling error. for more information about the source of the data and the accuracy of the estimates of the standard errors, confidence intervals
No comments:
Post a Comment